Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Top Tier Capital Partners’ Jessica Archibald

From Facebook’s acquisition of WhatsApp to Google’s purchase of Nest Labs, large US technology companies are increasingly using the ample cash on their balance sheets for M&A. Jessica Archibald, managing director at Top Tier Capital Partners, examines how this trend is likely to continue.

The motivation is largely defensive, eliminating perceived competition while diversifying into new business areas that can help these buyers deliver sustained performance in a fast-changing environment.

“If you look at the cost of acquiring a customer and you add all that up – how many customers they have, what’s the cost of that – and then the cost of eliminating the competition, is it better for a tech company to wait and watch a company like WhatsApp develop and then acquire it or is it better for them to start a business internally?” Archibald says. “And so I think we are going to see a lot more exits through M&A that are going to be high valuations.”

The combination of willing trade buyers and robust public markets has contributed to improved performance by US venture capital funds in recent years. Archibald adds that the balance between capital and liquidity is also better.

“In the 1990s you saw a lot of good performance, then capital came into the industry in 2000s, there was too much capital and not enough liquidity, and performance really went down. And so then the capital fell,” she explains. “Fund sizes are now smaller. Companies need less money to get started and you can get some earlier validation from revenues. The funds are the right size and the funds own enough of the companies that when they go public they have a meaningful impact on performance.”

The role technology has played in allowing companies to establish themselves with less capital, should not be underestimated. Cloud-based solutions have globalized the industry, making it easier for a truly compelling business model to achieve critical mass in a shorter amount of time.

“It doesn’t matter where you start a company now because your customers – if it’s a consumer product or website – can be anywhere in the world. That has been a fundamental shift,” Archibald says. “It has changed our investment strategy to think not where the company is being started but where the business and where the market is focused.”